From the case given in the article, we can see that the
failure does not appear because of nothing. Though one of the seven sources of
innovation is about process innovation, this one is not really the thing. When
big companies are trying to innovate, they tend to be more conservative than
those start-up companies. They don’t want to start from zero and prefer to use
the resources they’ve already had. Therefore, when they try to innovate, they
still can’t get rid of those bad things and their thoughts have been limited.
From my perspective, it is more like doing budget. Since
large companies have such a long history and lots of data about their budget,
they don’t want to start from zero and do zero-based budget, which needs them
to put much more effort and resource in. They only like to do budget based on
historical data, such as incremental budget, only change a few things and seems
to be “more efficient” than zero-budget. However, it cannot make companies
discover the inefficient things underlying the company, which will lead to
hidden problems in the future. Though zero-based budget seems to be
time-consuming and a waste of resources, it can help the company go through
what they have and give them a better thought about how to make the operation
better and more efficient.
In this case, what the company is trying to do is to avoid “waste
of time and resource” and try to come up with what they have. They only focus
on internal environment, instead of outside. The research of customer needs and
market size they have missed are critical to its failure. It is not an
innovation of new product; they just try to avoid the excess capacity they cannot
take fully advantage of, and they don’t make it. If they want to do innovation
for their products, they need to thoroughly analyze all the resources they have
and the industry environment, the market, and even the economy and policy they
have in the country they want to enter. And then they need to compare what they
need and what they have got in hand to see the gap and to acquire other things.
I think innovate is not much more complex than take
advantage of excess capacity and need to be treated well enough to really begin
the innovation. Otherwise they can make extra revenue by undertake outsourcing
orders from other companies.
I agree that innovate is not much more complex than take advantage of excess capacity and need to be treated well enough to really begin the innovation. The original innovation idea could be simple and not perfect, but it's important to launch the product and service into market and most importantly, pivot during the process all the time.
ReplyDelete